Marge Simpson is going to be on the cover of Playboy? This is wrong, wrong wrong. The Devil in Marge Simpson? Ew, ew, ew.... On a related note, don't do an image search for Marge Simpson naked. You can't unsee that stuff. (Link via The Ampersand)Previously on Popped Culture...
Cartoons I'd Like to F***
The stuff you can't unsee... I've seen it.
ReplyDeleteFinding pictures that go with bizarre blog entries means you see a lot of weird things when you are doing a google image search.
I know of what you speak. Still not sure what Playboy is thinking with this, other than the blast of media attention they got today.
ReplyDeleteBut I can't see people who want to see fictional cartoon characters in sexy poses being a long-term sales and circulation strategy.
Both Playboy and The Simpsons are dying brands, so they don't have a lot to lose.
ReplyDeleteWow. I don't even know what to say. I think I got a little sick in the stomach at the sight of that cover alone.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, I know some people who would want to see a variety of fictional characters in sexy poses. Jessica Rabbit, Betty Boop, the princess from 'Drawn Together' who's name totally escapes me at this particular moment. Call it what you want but there is a market for it.
Unfortunately.
I believe you are referring to Rule 34: If it exists, there is porn of it.
ReplyDelete